“In the ’90s we began to blossom and feel proud of ourselves, of our architecture, our designs, our cultural heritage – and our food. The secret ingredient to this whole revolution was believing in what you have. Loving it.”
– Gastón Acurio, Peruvian chef
Buenos Aires – Sipán should not be confused with Saipan, the largest island in the U.S. Commonwealth of the Marianas Islands; nor with Šipan, the largest of the Elaphiti Islands, off the northwest coast of Croatia. Sipán is an archaeological site in northern Peru, considered by many archaeologists to be one of the most important sites discovered in the last couple of decades, preserving as it does (did, perhaps, until the archaeologists found it) the undisturbed tomb of the Lord of Sipán, dating from the Moche culture – 100-800 A.D. – along with three other important tombs in the area, and a Caral fire temple dating back to 2600 B.C.E. In our particular case today, a relatively new restaurant here in BsAs is the topic, once again, not to be confused with the restaurant of the same name that was, until recently, located on Manhattan’s upper west side.
No, this particular Sipán is located in the heart of tourism – mere steps from the pedestrian souvenir mall that is Calle Florida, at Paraguay 624, 4315-0763, and bills itself as a destination for Peruvian food and Pisco (the “pisco bar” offers up, or at least based on the menu we received, a whole five different piscos – not exactly representative of the hundreds of them produced out there, in both Peru and Chile (I won’t get into the debate about who has the rights to the name for this brandy) – we order a couple of pisco sours and a mojito, the former two rather small renditions, the latter a decent amount, all well made. [Closed – their Palermo branch is still open]
The style of the place is sort of advertising billboard meets Japanese sushi bar – a look that you’d have to see to quite understand – with huge colorful photographs of ingredients on some walls, collaged together, and then little mini-shrines of buddhas and hello kitty-ish statuary along others. The clientele, for the most part, are clearly tourists, and particularly those well-heeled, as Sipán is not inexpensive – this is a spot for those who want to try reinterpreted Peruvian cuisine with some Japanese thrown in for good measure, but don’t want to have to deal with the more typical clatter and clutter of most Peruvian spots around town.
We start off with a trio of appetizers, very smartly brought to the table one by one after our waiter realizes we plan to share them. A ceviche of mero, or sea bass, hits the table perhaps too soon after being introduced to its citrus marinade. It’s pretty, but clearly the large chunks of fish are completely raw – and the waiter actually pours a pot of lemon juice over the top of them, while claiming that they were pre-marinated and this is just for added citrus. Given that the ceviche arrived within moments of our ordering it, that’s a dubious claim, and the crudo state of the fish belies it. Still, we mix it up and let it sit while we chat for a short while and then dig in. The fish is fresh, but the ceviche holds little more than fish, salt, and lemon juice. Nothing spicy – no hot peppers, no garlic, no ginger – a few slivers of green onion atop, some scattered toasted corn kernels. It is bland, plain and simple. We add some of the barely hot sauce that is on the table which adds some interest, but not much.
If you’re looking for interesting higher quality Peruvian food, both Moche and Zadvarie provide far better dining experiences; and if Peruvian-Japanese fusion is your desire, Osaka, while probably more expensive than Sipán, certainly delivers food of much higher quality and creativity. Or, Ceviche, which I found to be a bit too pricey for what it offered, was certainly better quality than this for about the same price. And all of these four (in Palermo) have better ambiance and, other than for the business traveler who simply doesn’t want to go more than a few blocks from a downtown hotel, better location.
What’s with the rice in the second pic? Looks like sushi rice.
Not far off – it didn’t have the vinegar and mirin added to it as it would for sushi, but was clearly the same sort of short-grained, slightly sticky rice.
hi there Dan, is this your choice today for the best Peruvian?
This place? Not remotely. If you read the review, we didn’t even particularly like it, especially the main courses.
Hi Dan,
A few friends and I went there a couple months ago. There was quite a difference even in the dishes that we all ordered. The dishes that my husband and I ordered were phenomenal (entrada of salmon tiradito I think with passionfruit sauce, and a seafood curry). Our friends ordered ceviche and the seco de cordero. Theirs was mediocre at best. The lamb was very dry.
That seems to be the general consensus. Some people have been and loved everything they tried, others hated it, and some felt it was mixed, depending on the dish – it seems there are just some things they do well and some things they simply don’t.
[…] – we enjoyed this meal more than we did those at Astrid & Gascón, Francesco, Sipán and others. So, expensive, yes. But worth it. Definitely […]
[…] Cevichería Peruana, Uriarte 1648 in Palermo. Now, it would be easy to just send you back to the review of the original in Microcentro and wash my hands of the whole thing, but, five years down the road, and, the experience […]